Issue Of Gun Control And Violence Essays - Firearms, Gun Politics

Issue of Gun Control and Violence The issue of gun control and violence, both in Canada and the United States, is one that simply will not go away. If history is to be any guide, no matter what the resolution to the gun control debate is, it is probable that the arguments pro and con will be much the same as they always have been. In 1977, legislation was passed by the Canadian Parliament regulating long guns for the first time, restructuring the availability of firearms, and increasing a variety of penalties . Canadian firearms law is primarily federal, and "therfore national in scope, while the bulk of the firearms regulation in the United States is at the state level; attempts to introduce stricter leglislation at the federal level are often defeated". The importance of this issue is that not all North Americans are necessarily supportive of strict gun control as being a feasible alternative to controlling urban violence. There are concerns with the opponents of gun control, that the professional criminal who wants a gun can obtain one, and leaves the average law-abiding citizen helpless in defending themselves against the perils of urban life. Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans? Or is it privilege? And what are the benefits of having strict gun control laws? Through the analysis of the writings and reports of academics and experts of gun control and urban violence, it will be possible to examine the issues and theories of the social impact of this issue. Part II: Review of the Literature A) Summary In a paper which looked at gun control and firearms violence in North America, Robert J. Mundt, of the University of North Carolina, points out that "Crime in America is popularly perceived [in Canada] as something to be expected in a society which has less respect for the rule of law than does Canadian society..." . In 1977, the Canadian government took the initiative to legislate stricter gun control. Among the provisions legislated by the Canadian government was a "Firearms Acquisition Certificate" for the purchase of any firearm, and strengthened the "registration requirements for handguns and other restricted weapons..." . The purpose of the 1977 leglislation was to reduce the availability of firearms, on the assumption that there is a "positive relationship between availability and use". In Robert J. Mundt's study, when compared with the United States, trends in Canada over the past ten years in various types of violent crime, suicide, and accidental death show no dramatic results, "and few suggestions of perceptible effects of the 1977 Canadian gun control legislation". The only positive effect , Mundt, found in the study was the decrease in the use of firearms in robbery with comparion to trends in the United States . Informed law enforcement officers in Canada, as in the United States, view the "impact of restricting the availability of firearms is more likely to impact on those violent incidents that would not have happened had a weapon been at hand"(152). In an article by Gary A. Mauser of the Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, he places special emphasis on the attitudes towards firearms displayed by both Canadians and Americans. According to Mauser, large majorities of the general public in both countries "support gun control legislation while simultaneously believing that they have the right to own firearms" (Mauser 1990:573). Despite the similarities, there are apparent differences between the general publics in the two countries. As Mauser states that "Canadians are more deferent to authority and do not support the use of handguns in self defence to the same extent as Americans". As Mauser points out that "it has been argued that cultural differences account for why Canada has stricter gun control legislation than the United States"(575). Surprisingly enough, nationwide surveys in both Canada and the United States "show remarkable similarity in the public attitude towards firearms and gun control"(586). Both Canada and the United States were originally English colonies, and both have historically had similar patterns of immigration. Moreover, Canadians are exposed to American television (both entertainment and news programming) and, Canadians and Americans read many of the same books and magazines. As a result of this, the Canadian public has adopted "much of

Sample Essay About Thomas Thumper Tomson

Sample Essay About Thomas 'Thumper' TomsonDo you know how to write a sample essay about Thomas 'Thumper' Tomson's argument against abortion? You can learn from this quick guide that helps you write a typical essay on the topic. Using this essay, you will not only improve your writing skills but also give the desired results in an effective manner.So, who is Thomas Tomson? He is a legal scholar, a proponent of American constitutionalism and defender of the rights of children. He is considered one of the most influential legal scholars who has contributed most to the advancement of the United States Constitution. One of his most famous works is his book The Right to Life. It has served as a basis for many debates among the constitutionalists.You can start your research about Thomas Tomson by doing some online research. Find some articles related to him and write them down so that you have a good outline in hand. You can use a calculator if you do not have much time to write the essay. If you want to avoid the trouble of plagiarism, try to use a text editor such as Microsoft Word to enter the keywords.After entering the keywords, change the content of the body of the essay to suit the theme. For example, for 'Tomson' take out the word 'struck', which shows the author's feelings against the procedure. After this, you should add a point about the importance of life and make a brief outline of the argument. In the next paragraph, you should give the reasons why the American Constitution gave you the right to make the decision in the matter. In this way, you can strengthen your argument.You can change the title of the essay after you are done with the outline of the essay. For example, if you want to show the consequences of childlessness, you may use ''. Moreover, you can leave some thoughts for the future by changing the topic of the essay. This will be useful if you want to teach other students how to write essays.In fact, you can also come up with your own conclus ions about Thomas Tomson's arguments about the morality of abortion. If you are worried about time, you can include a special section of the essay.What makes Thomas Tomson's argument about abortion so powerful is that he did not only defend the right to abortion but also defended the rights of the mother. He wrote the book in order to protect the rights of both the mother and the child. Finally, he raised the question of whether the mothers' rights are absolute or not. Most of the time, it was assumed that the right to abortion comes under the first amendment of the constitution, thus the debate turned to this.